Véhicules d'occasion et neufs PEUGEOT 307 CC. Avec 98 PEUGEOT 307 CC disponibles sur L'argus.fr, nous sommes parmi les leaders de l'annonce auto en France. 2 000 €. Compare Peugeot 307 CC 2.0i 16v 2003 vs Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TFSI 2006 vs Renault Megane 2 Phase 1 Cabriolet 1.9 dCi Luxe Privilege 2003 English Français Deutsch Svensk Português PT Español русский Italiano български Nederlands Polski Português BR Türkçe Tous les types de carrosseries automobiles ont conservé le nom d'origine du véhicule hippomobile correspondant. Certains tirent leur nom de leurs caractéristiques (coupé désigne un type de voiture dont la caisse a été raccourcie et le nombre de places réduit, cabriolet une voiture à capote rabattable), ou de leur utilisation (le break, du verbe to break, rompre, dresser, servait au 2522–2686 mm. Leergewicht : 1220–1570 kg. Vorgängermodell. Renault Mégane I. Nachfolgemodell. Renault Mégane III. Sterne im Euro-NCAP - Crashtest (2002) [1] Der Mégane II ist die zweite Generation des Kompaktklassewagens Mégane des französischen Automobilherstellers Renault . Utrustningen är alls inte unik. Peugeot 307 har precis samma grejor. Därtill ett skydd mot pisksnärtskador i framstolarna och en fotplatta som skyddar förarens fötter vid en krock. 307:an lyckades emellertid bara skrapa ihop 30 poäng i krocktestet, vilket räckte till fyra starka stjärnor. Renault Mégane fick 33 poäng. Großes Raumangebot. Der 308 CC ist ein Coupé-Cabriolet mit vier vollwertigen Sitzplätzen, einer im Vergleich zum 307 CC verbreiterten Spur und größerer Karosserie. Aufgrund der Struktur der Vordersitze, die hohe Beinfreiheit auf der Rückbank garantiert, bietet der 308 CC allen Insassen Komfort auf höchstem Niveau. EtlC. Get 3 months FREE breakdown cover! With 12 months of cover, new customers get an extra 3 months for free.* We're the UK’s best breakdown provider as voted by Auto Express drivers ANDY ENRIGHTIntroductionAlthough it seems that almost everybody is now jumping on the Coupe Cabriolet bandwagon, Peugeot were among the first to popularise the genre in this country and if you're after a reasonably priced car of this ilk, the French marque represents your best option. The 206CC has been the big seller but if you want something altogether bigger, more sophisticated and a good deal better looking, you'll need a 307CC. Here we take a look at whether one of these technically complex cars makes a sound used Covered: 2003-to date: (2dr coupe/cabrio petrol 138/180bhp])HistoryPrior to the 307CC arriving on the market in July 2003, your choices for a tin-toped cabriolet extended to either a 206CC or some seriously expensive tackle like the Lexus SC430 or the Mercedes SLK and SL models. In the middle market where most prospective cabriolet buyers did their shopping there was a big, fat zero. With the benefit of their experience with the 206CC behind them, Peugeot were able to bring the 307CC to market a crucial few months before their big rivals Renault could launch the Megane CC. Available with a two-litre engine of either 138 or 180bhp, the 307 CC was an instant hit, its lines a good deal better resolved than many of the rather lumpen coupe cabriolets we've seen since. The 307 CC was facelifted in time for summer 2005. The gaping air-intake in the front bumper, huge headlamps and shortened bonnet with pronounced side ridges all mark these cars out. In addition, there were trim enhancements, a 2bhp power boost for the 138bhp petrol engine and a 136bhp HDi diesel engine to top off the range. The 308 CC arrived in 2009 spelling the end for the 307 You GetIt seems virtually compulsory for each subsequent cabriolet release to one-up its predecessors in the sheer complexity and ingenuity of its roof mechanism. Although the folding metal roof isn't the newest idea on the block (Peugeot were in fact at it in 1934 with its 401 model), it can still surprise bystanders, largely due to the fact that with the hood up, the 307 CC just doesn't look like a convertible car. The roofline is sleek and low slung in proper coupe tradition and Peugeot gave the car's credibility a major boost by announcing that the 2004 World Rally Car would be based on the 307 CC body. Modern multiplex wiring techniques mean that many sophisticated electronic functions have been included. Peugeot list a series of refinements as long as your arm, most of them concerned with safety. As well as the standard anti- lock brakes, traction control and twin front airbags, the 307 CC features Electronic Brake Force Distribution (EBFD), Electronic Stability Programme (ESP), side airbags, automatic rain sensing wipers and automatic light sensing headlamps, seatbelt pretensioners and pyrotechnically operated rear rollover hoops that automatically deploy if the car thinks that, despite all the electronic safety systems, things are going to go dirty side up. A Thatcham category 1 alarm, electric windows and door safety brackets that prevent the doors opening in the event of a high-speed incident complete the ensemble. You certainly can't accuse Peugeot of ignoring the detail. Standard equipment on both cars includes cruise control, digital air conditioning, aluminium interior detailing and a full body coloured exterior. The 180bhp version features a comprehensive equipment list that includes 17-inch alloy wheels, half- leather trim sports seats, rear parking sensors, electrically folding door mirrors and a five-disc CD autochanger integrated into the fascia to prevent theft. The multiplex wiring system means that optional extras such as satellite navigation and the hands-free phone system can be integrated easily and cost effectively when specifying the car. Other commonly specified optional features you'll come across include pearlescent paint and a full leather interior trim. Like many cars of its type, the Peugeot 307CC offers a decent sized boot, the capacity of which is decimated when the hood is folded down but it's a price many are willing to pay for the additional refinement, safety and security that the metal roof affords. Both cars feature a manual gearbox but the 138bhp also offers the option of a four-speed automatic, which is a boon for those who want to sup on some particulates in the You PayPlease contact us for an exact up-to-date to Look ForIt's imperative that the hood mechanism works properly, as this is a common fault, often getting stuck half way up or down. The boot should close fully when the hood is retracted and there should be no scrapes or graunches as it operates. The 307CC also suffers from electrical gremlins. A test car of ours would routinely flash a depollution failure warning and then travel at no more than 30mph. The engines themselves seem worthy units but the ancillaries can be problematic. Also check for body panel alignment, interior carpeting that easily comes unstuck and kerbed alloy Parts(approx based on a 2004 307CC 180) Consumables for the 307CC are reasonably priced. An air filter is around £10 with an oil filter retailing at approximately £15. Spark plugs are £9 each with a timing belt weighing in at the £30 the RoadTwo engines are available. The 138bhp engine that powers the 206GTi will be the choice for most but you can also go for a powerful 180bhp unit borrowed from the 206 GTi 180. The 307CC 180 weighs in at 1,870kg, 168kg more than a conventional 3-door 307 with the 138bhp engine. Look to the performance figures and you can see how the CC's additional mass makes itself felt. The 307 3-door will reach 60mph from standstill in and the 307CC 180 which, remember, has an extra 42bhp in its locker, does the 60mph sprint in 10 seconds dead. The extra power makes for a 140mph top speed, significantly better that the 127mph available in the fixed roof car but at low speeds where it matters, the CC 180 feels significantly less flexible. Indeed, the 307CC 180 is only of a second faster to 60mph that the entry level CC with its 138bhp output. If you're looking for a sporting drive, the 307CC isn't the Peugeot 307CC is the most cost effective way of purchasing a four seat hard topped cabriolet, but it's not the most reliable car we've ever encountered. Take your time to look at a few and try to pick a decent example. Współcześnie wytwarzane coupe kabriolety nie są nowym wynalazkiem, ale jazda nimi sprawia tyle radości, co w 1936 r. Peugeot produkował model 402 L Eclipse z elektrycznie składanym w bagażniku stalowym dachem. Współcześnie wytwarzane coupe kabriolety nie są więc nowym wynalazkiem, ale jazda nimi sprawia tyle radości, co kiedyś. Fot. Renault: Renault Megane Coupe-Cabriolet ma szklany, składany dach, czym wyróżnia spośród innych aut tego naszym klimacie samochody ze składanym, sztywnym dachem są idealnym rozwiązaniem - gdy świeci słońce samochód można zmienić w kabriolet, gdy zaczyna padać deszcz, po naciśnięciu guzika zmienia się on w zamknięte coupe. Mamy więc dwa samochody w jednym, co byłoby idealnym rozwiązaniem, gdyby nie wysoka cena zakupu. Każdy Peugeot 307 CC ma składany dach wykonany z blachy. Jego składanie nie trwa dłużej niż 25 porównywanych samochodów - Peugeot 307 CC i Renault Megane Coupe-Cabriolet kosztuje ponad 90 tys. zł. W tę cenę wliczono nie tylko mechanizm składania dachu, lecz także wzmocnienia nadwozia, które tylko z pozoru wygląda jak w hatchbacku. W rzeczywistości to bardziej skomplikowana i kosztowna konstrukcja. Cechy szczególneDo coupe kabrioletu Peugeota zdążyliśmy się już przyzwyczaić za sprawą modelu 206 CC. Większy model - 307 CC powiela tę koncepcję. Cechą charakterystyczną Megane CC jest W zależności od położenia dachu bagażnik ma objętość 190 lub 490 składanego dachu, ale wykonanego ze szkła o grubości 3,15 mm. Dzięki temu, nawet po rozłożeniu dachu można czuć się jak w kabriolecie - tak twierdzi Renault, który tę śmiałą konstrukcję zakupił w niemieckiej firmie Karmann. Peugeot 307 CC wykorzystuje płytę podłogową hatchbacka, co ma tę zaletę, że 4 osoby mogą podróżować w miarę wygodnie. Peugeot 307 CC ma przestronniejsze wnętrze niż Megane również wykorzystał płytę podłogową z Megane II, jednak skrócił o 103 mm rozstaw osi. W efekcie na tylnej kanapie jest dość ciasno. We wnętrzu obu pojazdów wykorzystano elementy znane z analogicznych wersji hatchback. Przycisk uruchamiający procedurę składania lub rozkładania dachu w Megane umieszczony jest w niewygodnym miejscu - blisko dźwigni hamulca ręcznego. Po rozłożeniu dachu bagażniki obu konkurentów są dość duże - w Megane - 490 l, a w Peugeocie - 350 l. Gdy dach chowa się w bagażniku, przestrzeń bagażowa zmniejsza się do 190 l w Megane i 205 l - w Peugeocie. SilnikiDo napędu Peugeota wybraliśmy silnik benzynowy o pojemności 2 l i mocy 136 KM. Silnik o niemal identycznej pojemności skokowej i mocy napędza również Megane. W Peugeocie zastosowano 5-biegową skrzynię przekładniową, a w Renaulcie - 6-biegową. Obaj konkurenci mają zbliżone zapotrzebowanie na paliwo. W mieście zużywają nieco ponad 11 l na 100 km i nie jest to We wnętrzu Megane CC wykorzystano elementy z hatchbacka. Przycisk składania lub rozkładania dachu umieszczony przy dźwigni hamulca ręcznego jest mało wygodny w jeżeli weźmiemy pod uwagę większą masę o ok. 200 kg od analogicznych hatchbacków. Zwiększona masa ma również wpływ na uzyskiwane czasy rozpędzania. Wrażenia z jazdyW obu autach siedzi się niżej niż w hatchbackach. Po opuszczeniu dachu i podniesieniu bocznych szyb do góry w W skład seryjnego wyposażenia Peugeota wchodzi układ ESP, za który w Megane trzeba pasażerskiej nie odczuwa się podmuchów wiatru. Po zamknięciu dachu w obu autach jest cicho, co dobrze świadczy o sztywności skrętnej nadwozia. Poziom hałasu jest zbliżony do poziomu hałasu w tradycyjnym hatchbacku. Megane okazał się autem nieco szybszym od Peugeota, ma jednak nieco mniej skuteczny układ hamulcowy. Oba auta charakteryzują się dobrymi własnościami jezdnymi. Wynika to ze sztywniejszej niż w hatchbackach charakterystyki elementów tłumiących zawieszenia. Sztywniejsze zawieszenie nie wpłynęło negatywnie na komfort jazdy. PodsumowaniePeugeot 307 CC jest autem większym od Megane i nieco lepiej wyposażonym, w układ stabilizacji toru jazdy ESP. W Megane układ ESP wymaga dopłaty, ale w standardzie montuje się poduszkę kierowcy zapobiegającą nurkowaniu. Niebagatelną zaletą Renault jest szklany dach, przez który zawsze widać niebo. Nasza ocena:(+ oznacza przewagę nad konkurentem) 307 CC Megane CCPrzestronność wnętrza +Silnik remisPoziom hałasu Hamulce + Dynamika + Zużycie paliwa remisNowoczesność konstrukcji remis Wyposażenie +Wybrane dane techniczne: 307 CC Megane CCTyp silnika benzynowy benzynowyLiczba cylindrów/zaworów 4/16 4/16 Pojemność skokowa (cm3): 1997 1998Moc maksymalna (KM/obr/min): 136/6000 136/5500Maks. moment obr. (Nm/obr/min): 190/4100 191/3750Przyspieszenie 0-100 km/h(s): 10,9 9,9Przyspieszenie (IV b.) 60-100 km/h (s): 10,8 8,9Prędkość maksymalna (km/h): 207 205Głośność (IV b.) przy 100 km/h (dB)*: 67 67Droga hamowania od 100 km/h (m): 42,5 43,6Pojemność bagażnika (dm3): 205/350 190/490Pojemność zbiornika paliwa (dm3): 60 60Zużycie paliwa: trasa/miasto (dm3/100 km): 6,2/11,5 6,5/11,2Długość x szerokość x wysokość (cm): 435 x 176 x 142 436 x 178 x 140Rozstaw osi (cm): 261 252Gwarancja mechaniczna/perforacyjna (lata) 2/12 2/12Cena (zł): 93 000 92 500Wyposażenie seryjne: Peugeot 307 CC Megane CC Luxe Dynamiquepoduszki powietrzne 4 5układ ABS s sukład wspomagania nagłego hamowania - sukład zapobiegający poślizgowi kół przy ruszaniu ASR s -układ kontroli toru jazdy ESP s oelektryczne sterowanie szyb przednich/tylnych s/s s/selektrycznie sterowane/podgrzewane lusterka s/s s/-klimatyzacja manualna/automatyczna -/s s/-radio CD s scentralny zamek s swspomaganie układu kierowniczego s ss - wyposażenie seryjneo - wyposażenie za dopłatąPolecane ofertyMateriały promocyjne partnera how about 6 series cab? 6 series out of my reach. If got that kind of money, then the e cab would be my choice! It will be a second car for me, short term ( < 2yrs) low mileage, once in your life kind of fun experience, so long-term maintenance not really a big issue. After driving for 15 years, perhaps it's ok to put aside all the negatives which I used to consider, and just do it! I have 2 young kids, so mx5, which I personally like, is out. I also thought of the 207, but the rear is really really tight - not even my young ones can fit in there! Eos is also good, however, resale not many and super ex. So, still back to the first 2 choices. You are thinking of buying a new car and want to treat yourself. Your last car was a hatchback. It was fine, but unexciting. This time you are going to get something jazzy. Something that says, “Look at me, I enjoy life and I’m not afraid to be seen doing it.” You’ve thought of a sports car, something low-slung with a buzzy engine. An MX-5 or MG TF would be nice. You are also considering a coupé. Hyundai make a nice one. The Toyota Celica looks gorgeous. But then you’re not sure. The first two aren’t really that practical. Insurance is expensive and they have soft-top roofs. They are both two-seaters, too, and not much good for carrying kids or friends. The coupés have the edge on practicality, but the downside is their tops don’t come off. They’re fun, but you know that even in sun-deprived Ireland, open-top motoring is the best there is. And, after all, you want to make a statement. Ideally then, what you want is a car that offers you a good mix of some of the best aspects of both a convertible and a coupé. And while you may have been limited in terms of choice some years ago, the good news is that, as of now, this is no longer the case. Roll on the two new French lovelies, you see here. Cars that join the German Opel Astra Convertible in offering you your mid-sized coupé/convertible cake and letting you eat most of the base and icing, if not the cherry and the creamy inside. With these two, and we need another cliché here, you get most of the best of both worlds. They are as close to full-sized four-seaters as you’ll get when it comes to convertibles. The back seats can be used. They have hard, secure tops. They have a boot. They are more stylish than your average hatchback. They are more comfortable and practical than your typical sports car. They are also coupé-like with their roofs up, and they stand out in ‘play-it-safe Ireland’ like those pink Manolo Blahniks you picked up in New York. (Note to males: If you are interested enough in these cars to want a comparison of your own, think a very loud Paul Smith tie). Plus, and this is the good bit, when the sun comes out, they award your investment by transforming themselves into elegant chariots at the touch of a button. They let you cruise around in some considerable style, happy in the knowledge that you no longer own an average hatchback. If any of that appeals to you, then you are probably already planning how you will be able to afford the €30,000 plus needed to get your hands on one of these. And if you are, then you are probably also asking which one of the two should you go for? Which one do you need to own in order to look down your nose at someone driving the other? The cars are the Renault Megane Cabrio and the Peugeot 307 CC – which, believe it or not, stands for coupé-cabriolet. Both arrived only recently in Ireland. Image: Peugeot:✔✔✔✔✘ Renault:✔✔✔✔✘ Let’s get something straight here from the off. Neither of these two cars comes close to matching more expensive, soft-top, convertibles when it comes to this category. An Audi A4 cabriolet could make these two run from the ball in tears. A convertible Saab 9-3 would send them home empty-handed from a beauty contest with mascara on their cheeks. They are mid-sized cars that have been worked, for want of a better word, into hardtop convertibles, and it shows at their rear where those extensive and complicated lids have to go, in particular. The Megane is fussy and lumpy. The Peugeot is smoother, but plump and somewhat bland, despite nice touches like the rear LED taillight clusters. That said, however, they do have a certain French elegance which makes them good looking enough to attract envious looks and neat packages when one considers that they are far cheaper than our supermodel cabriolets mentioned above. The Peugeot has a steeply raked windscreen that gives it a pretty face. The Renault is very individual when you get used to the lines. Both are at their best with the roof down naturally and, while we are on the subject, the Renault’s lid is easily the coolest. It’s a see through glass effort that gives the car an airy feel when closed. It folds away in 22 seconds, three seconds faster than the metal roof on the Peugeot. Inside the latter, however, is the one that will please more though. This is thanks to small touches like the leather trimmed steering wheel and the aluminium finish to the centre console, air vents, pedals and interior door handles. The Peugeot’s roll bars are also not visible when its lid comes off, adding to its smoothness. Overall then, these cars score well here for what they are. The Peugeot just sneaks ahead in CBG’s books, although we could easily understand why one might argue otherwise. Reliability and Quality: Peugeot:✔✔✔✘✘ Renault:✔✔✔✘✘ The joke about French cars used to be that they would fall apart inside and out, but stay going forever. This thankfully is no longer the case as build quality has been improved to match long-serving strong engines. At Renault, standards are not high with good materials used in the cars’ interiors, even if they are still not up to German standards (current Golf excluded). Peugeot, too, are building well-finished cars, albeit ones that could still be improved. The hatchback versions of both cars have been known to suffer from electrical glitches, but it is too early to say if this will be the case here. As with some new convertibles, they may also experience difficulties with the roof-folding mechanisms, but, again, we don’t know yet. The roof in the 307’s smaller sister the 206 CC did give some teething problems, but a different company makes the one in the 307. Performance: Peugeot:✔✔✔✘✘ Renault:✔✔✔✘✘ Both these cars weigh a bit and their performance suffers as a result. Being convertibles hey are loaded with heavy safety reinforcements in addition to the roof-folding mechanisms. The 307’s kerb weight is 1457 kg, 210 k’s heavier than the equivalent hatchback model. The Renault weighs 1365 kg, the roof alone accounting for 78 kg. This means their litre engines need to be worked hard to make progress. In the Peugeot, the unit outputs 110 bhp and the car manages a slow 0-62 mph time of seconds. In the Renault, you have 115 bhp. The car does 0-62 mph in a slower seconds and has a maximum speed of 116 mph. Currently; Renault has no plans to introduce other engine sizes into Ireland. There is a litre in other countries and a diesel. The Peugeot, on the other hand, is available powered by a 138 bhp in both manual and automatic, and with a 180 bhp, engine in sport trim. Prices for these are €36,625, €38,275 and €41,995. Equipment: Peugeot:✔✔✔✔✘ Renault:✔✔✔✘✘ Neither of these cars are short kit. In the Peugeot, you get all sorts from an in-dash CD player to follow me home headlights. The alloy wheels are 16-inch, you have climate control, central locking and an alarm, but leather seats are an option. In the Megane, you get leather seats as standard but climate control is an option as is an alarm. Other standard features include the same type of headlights as in the Peugeot, central locking ,and 16-inch alloy wheels. Safety and Security: Peugeot:✔✔✔✘✘ Renault:✔✔✔✔✘ There is no debate here. Safety is where Renault excels and its Megane has already scooped the maximum five stars in Euro NCAP tests. The 307 CC scored a very respectable four, but it’s still one less star. Both cars have been reinforced to add strength in key areas. In the 307,you get strengthened front windscreen pillars and B posts. You also get a rear, vertical bulkhead, eight tie rods under the roof assembly, and stronger doors. In the Megane, the car’s sides are reinforced, the front pillar assembly is stiffened and the engine compartment layout is specially designed to prevent it intruding into the car in an accident. Roll bars are also fitted in both to ensure safety in the case of a rollover. In the Megane these are fixed. In the 307, twin roll-hoops are fired upwards in 150 milliseconds from a cassette behind the rear headrests. Standard safety equipment in the Megane also includes ABS (antilock) and emergency-braking assistance, adaptive front and side and anti-submarining airbags. In the 307 you get driver, passenger and side airbags. ABS, EBFD, (Electronic Brake Force Distribution) brake assist. ESP (Electronic Stability Programme) and traction control. Roominess: Peugeot:✔✔✔✔✘ Renault:✔✔✔✔✘ Both these cars claim to be genuine four-seaters and this is true to some extent. The back seats are usable, however four adults are not going to be comfortable in them for long and they are better suited for kids. The Peugeot is a small bit roomier, but not by a significant amount. Both cars have good-sized boots with the roofs up, but when the lid is down this is obviously compromised. In the 307,the boot has 350 litres of volume with the roof up and 204 with it down. The boot in the Megane has as much as 490 litres of volume. This shrinks to 190 litres with the roof down. For convertibles though, this car impresses in this section. Running Costs: Peugeot:✔✔✔✔✘ Renault:✔✔✔✔✘ As these are hardtop cars with good safety features, your insurance should not suffer that badly, but expect to pay extra for the fact that they are convertibles. You can rest assured as well that your car should hold its value well as demand for these second-hand should be strong. Your fuel economy figures are fine, but not great. The litre Megane manages an average consumption of mpg, the same powered 307 CC returns an average of mpg. Comfort: Peugeot:✔✔✔✔✘ Renault:✔✔✔✔✘ Both cars score well here. In the Peugeot, the seats are nice and wide and you can adjust the steering wheel for height and reach. In the Megane the interior is well laid out, the seat is height-adjustable and the steering wheel adjusts for rake and reach. With the roof down in the Peugeot, the steeply-raked windscreen can seem too close to your head. In the Megane, the visible roll bars limit your rear view. The Renault’s roof makes it a nice place to spend time and you should note that its glass blocks out infra-red rays and absorbs most of the sun’s energy when up. Wind buffeting and scuttle-shake, the problems you get in all convertibles, do not affect these cars to any great extent, but the Peugeot is more solid and less flexy. Fun To Drive: Peugeot:✔✔✔✘✘ Renault:✔✔✘✘✘ Remember the clichéd bit about the cake when we mentioned not getting to eat the creamy inside and the cherry on top. Well, this is the category where these cars’ weaknesses show. Neither of the two is sporty, in fact they don’t really come close. As we have seen already, their performance figures are a lot less impressive than their roofs and sadly they stop short of being as dynamic as cars like our MX-5 or Toyota Celica. The Peugeot is a big, heavy car and feels boaty on the road. It will go around bends, t just isn’t that sharp. Thankfully though, its steering is well weighted and you can be confident about what handling abilities it does have. The Megane, actually feels livelier, but it’s slower and its steering is vague to the point where you will give up trying to push it along. Both cars are also soft in terms of ride. This is good, ok it comes to comfort, but not great when you feel like winding them on. To be fair, neither company makes extravagant claims about their cars’ sporting characteristics. Both are happy to have their cars recognised for what they are and that is competent, stylish cruisers where the fun is in the open air experience they provide. Yes, indeed, just think of them as inexpensive grand tourers and you have the right idea. On the open road, preferably one with few bends, and with the hoods hidden in their big behinds, they are very driveable and a joy to be in. Value for Money: Peugeot:✔✔✔✔✘ Renault:✔✔✔✔✘ They are not cheap, but they are not expensive either. For the asking prices of €32,345 for the Peugeot and €32,000 for the Renault, you do get a very useable everyday car that can make the weekends or your day off that bit special. You are paying a premium on standard hatchbacks, but you are getting a return for your money. Both cars, too, come with excellent, standard equipment and their prices are well below other cars that offer the same open-top experiences. The Verdict: We were going to give it to the Peugeot and then the Renault and then the Peugeot and then the Renault and then we gave it to the Peugeot and then we changed our minds and called it a draw. The Peugeot is that bit more fun to drive and it’s more stylish. The Renault is safer and has a cool, glass roof. If you are thinking of buying one of the two, the best advice we can give you here is to test-drive both. In the end your own opinion will be the deciding factor as these cars are so alike in so many ways that there is nothing between them from an objective point of view. No one in either of these cars, we have to say, is going to be doing any looking down their noses at anyone in the other. HOME page / compare / Peugeot 307 CC 16V vs Renault Megane Coupe-Cabriolet 16V Compare two cars 2001. - 2005. C - Small family car cabriolet, 2 door front Badges Production Vehicle class Body style Wheel drive Safety 2002. - 2006. C - Small family car cabriolet, 2 door front Dimensons & Outlines Length Width Height Boot (min) Boot (max) Fuel tank 2001 Peugeot 307 CC 2002 Renault Megane Coupe-Cabriolet © GAMA1 Solutions. Copying & distribution prohibited. Engine Petrol 4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Nat. Asp. Engine Fuel Configuration Aspiration Displacement Power Torque Petrol 4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Nat. Asp. Performance (manual gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Performance (automatic gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Expenses Virtual Adviser's™ opinion Overview Well, these are two pretty similar cars we have here! It's only details that could potentially make the difference. Considering they both belong to the small family car segment and utilize the same 2-door cabriolet body style and the front wheel drive system, it all comes up to the specific petrol engine choice they offer. The first one has a Peugeot-engineered powertrain under the hood, a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 109hp unit, while the other one gets its power and torque from a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 112hp engine designed by Renault. Safety Both vehicles got tested by European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP), with the Renault being a slightly better choice apparently. That aside, let's consider some other aspects which affect safety. Both vehicles belong to the small family car segment, which is generally classifying them somewhere in the middle safety-wise, still it doesn't help us solve our dilemma, does it? Furthermore, when it comes to weight, a factor that most people underestimate, 307 offers a marginal difference of 9% more metal. Reliability Manufacturers have been building their reliability reputation for decades now and, generally speaking, it appears that both brands display similar results in faults and breakdowns, when all the models are taken into account. These are the official statistics, while our visitors describe reliability of Peugeot with an average rating of and models under the Renault badge with out of 5. Some independent research have also placed 307 as average reliability-wise, and Megane is more or less at the same apart, owners of different cars powered by the same engine as 307 rank it on average as while the one under the competitor's bonnet gets out of 5. Performance & Fuel economy Renault is a bit more agile, reaching 100km/h in seconds less than its competitor. In addition to that it accelerates all the way to 195 kilometers per hour, 4km/h more than the other car. When it comes to fuel economy the winner has to be Megane, averaging around liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (41 mpg), in combined cycle. We can't ignore that 10% difference compared to 307. Verdict Peugeot appears just a bit more reliable, although the difference is truly marginal. The most important thing when deciding between any two vehicles should always be safety, both passive and active. In my opinion, everything taken into account, Megane offers slightly better overall protection and takes the lead. It all continues in the same direction, with Renault offering somewhat better performance, just enough to call it quicker. To make things even better, it consumps less fuel! All together, there's not much more to say, in this case I wouldn't even consider anything but Renault. In any case that's my personal view, built upon all the data available to me. What should decide here though is the way you feel about the two vehicles, and I hope you'll find my guidelines useful in the process. Also, you could use the oportunity to find out which car, everything taken into account, would be the perfect choice for you in the eyes of the virtual adviser™, out of vehicles we currently have in our database. Check a car by its VIN number

peugeot 307 cc vs renault megane cabrio